How To Judge Writing Topics From Homework Requirments

Assignment Writing Manchester

Have you ever felt that at some point, the teacher was trying to embarrass most students when arranging academic papers? At times, we may even experience what is commonly referred to as a writing block—the dreaded experience of staring at an assignment, reading it over and over, being unable to continue, and finding no way to get into it. But writing an academic paper involves a series of controllable steps. Keeping this in mind can help you deal with any anxiety you may be feeling at first. If you find yourself “clueless” about starting a paper, it may be because you skipped an important step. You may try coming up with a paper before finding and narrowing down your topic.

Enter the conversation

Try to think of academic paper writing as a real opportunity to connect with the material, to express your ideas for focused and provocative thinking on the text of your choice. In short, use the paper as an opportunity to challenge yourself and contribute to an ongoing dialogue among scholars about the topic discussed. It’s about your intellectual development.

Writing is not playing someone else’s game. Successful writing involves asking your questions about your chosen sources and framing them. You focus on this task while locating and expressing your special interests.

Primary and Secondary Data Sources

If you’re a lawyer and have to present a case for your client, the worst thing you can do is face a jury and rant about beliefs and opinions. (“Trust me, this guy is honorable. This guy is honorable. He’ll never do what he’s been accused of.”) Instead, you’ll want to look for evidence and clues about the situation and investigate suspects, maybe going to the library for books on investment fraud or lockpicking. In any case, you need to do proper research to avoid appearing stupid in court. Even if you know what you’re arguing about – your client’s innocence – you still need to figure out a way to convince the jury. You will need a variety of sources to support your case. The same goes for writing an academic paper, as the paper uses primary and secondary sources for argumentation.

Primary academic sources are sources that others have not analyzed. These sources include but are not limited to novels, poems, autobiographies, court case records, and data sources such as censuses, diaries, and congressional records.

A book or article analyzing another text is a secondary source. They are useful for supporting your arguments and making counterarguments, which in academic papers are your responsibility to acknowledge and refute.

These are the ground rules for deciding whether a source is primary or secondary, but some ambiguities exist. For example, an article that presents an original argument can be your primary source if all you do is analyze the argument of that article. But if the article cites statistics you decide to cite to support your arguments about the different texts, it functions as a secondary source. So, always remember that an academic paper presents an original argument – ​​yours, not that of the author of your secondary source. While secondary sources are helpful, you should focus your paper on one or more primary sources.

topic-to-topic relationship

In court, the topic is never “jurisprudence,” “the legal system,” or even the huge abstraction of “the death penalty” or “guilt and innocence.” All of these are themes. A subject is special. So-and-so v. so-and-so case. Academic debates also have themes. But if you want to write an article on “So-and-so v. So-and-so,” you don’t know what to put and not to put. You’ll wind up recreating the court’s record of the case.

Narrow the scope of the topic

The title of an academic dissertation must be sufficiently pertinent and specific to make a coherent argument. For example, “the role of so-and-so in the case of so-and-so v. so-and-so” is a topic that has a certain narrowness. But if “so-and-so” is extremely general, it must be further narrowed down. “The Role of Social Pressures in the Case of Jones v. Smith” is an example – it’s too general. “Alleged Jury Tampering in the Case of Jones v. Smith” narrows down these social pressures and begins to make a persuasive argument. Of course, who can narrow down even this topic further).

The steps below will help you focus your topic, find a topic, and narrow it down.

  • Read your main sources carefully, and then, with the task in mind, read them again, looking for passages that relate directly to the task and your curiosity and interests. When you find a paragraph that interests you, write down the reasons for its importance. If you don’t, you may later forget its importance.
  • Annotate some of the most engaging paragraphs – write your thoughts, opinions, and notes on specific words, phrases, and sentences. Don’t censor your ideas! Just write, even if you don’t think your writing is useful. Now, put your impressions on paper; later, you will begin to organize and unify them.
  • Group paragraphs and ideas into categories. Try to eliminate thoughts that don’t fit anywhere. Ask yourself if any of the emerging categories are related to other categories. Are there any categories that connect, contradict, echo, justify, or refute other categories? The category that connects the most to other categories is probably your topic.
  • See some relevant secondary sources – see what other scholars have said – to get an idea of ​​potential rebuttals to your developing topic. Remember. When taking notes, be sure to fully cite all information. It’s a lot easier than going back and figuring out where you got a certain sentence from, or worse, not being able to find it.

Our recommended Company for Assignment Writing Manchester agency is the leading UK company named Homework Assignment. You must hear before.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *